Michael Doornbos

21 Sep, 2009

“Significant” water on the moon

Posted by: mike In: Strange| Think| space| take action

Some sites are talking about  a press conference being set up on Thursday to talk about what they are calling “Evidence of Water on the Moon – Lots of It”.

If you’re not a space geek, let me back up a second since NASA isn’t even on most people’s mind these days and fill you in on what’s going on.

The short short version.

We’ve had this space shuttle since the 1980’s.  Technologically amazing, but pretty boring from an exploration standpoint.  As a result, the fine folks at NASA have performed amazing feats of technological greatness and the public has met this with a collective “ho hum”.

In 2004, President Bush announced a pretty bold plan to phase out the Shuttle and reach towards returning to the moon by 2020. Programs are established, committees ensue, congress under-funds the whole thing and  5 years later, they are pretty behind. And by pretty behind I mean there is no freaking way it’s going to work.

President Obama commissions a committee headed by Norm Augustine, a longtime space industry player, to put together a group to evaluate the current state of the program.

To put it mildly, things don’t appear to be going well.

As a member of the general public, one might have caught a few minutes of the Senate Hearings on the matter last week and thought “uh oh.  Oh.  Wow, did she just say that?”.

As an advocate of space exploration, I was actually a little embarrassed by the whole thing.

So today, NASA would like 3 billion dollars a year MORE in funding to put their goal back on track.

All week, I’ve been hearing rumors about the President making an upcoming John F. Kennedy style epic call to return to space exploration.

I really, really want for us to return exploring space.

Bad.

But if this whole thing was a movie, this would be the part when the scientists all throw popcorn at the screen and cry “Oh, come on.” and “How convenient that they found water on the Moon right at that point.”

I’m no conspiracy theorist, but my BS radar just went into high gear. For starters, what exactly does “significant” mean?

Here’s to hoping I’m wrong.

Share on Facebook
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
blog comments powered by Disqus

Flickr photostream

dizee posted a photo:dizee posted a photo:dizee posted a photo:probably not going fishing todaydizee posted a photo:dizee posted a photo:dizee posted a photo:Decided to use HAL as the icondizee posted a photo:I didn't even know Omni did booksdizee posted a photo:  Posted via email  from Michael's posterousdizee posted a photo:  Posted via email  from Michael's posterous